In the modern library why do we still worry about gate count?

The first response I usually get is that the number relates to user traffic, which equals library use.  From this administrators can adjust library hours to suit user needs.  Where this may seem like a viable opinion, how many libraries can tout having contents through which their entrants only do “library-centric” activities?  When we started adding cafes, video games, and group study rooms; how far did we stray from what makes a library a library?

I am not saying these innovations aren’t effective or contrary to our mission, but are there other ways to determine peak activity and effective library use?

Head counts done through sampling are another common means to identify library use by time, but this is a rather labor intensive process that may not capture consisten trends in seasonal use.  In larger libraries this process may be more wasteful in staff utilization than the value of the data produced.  If a parton shifts floors or areas, will the recorder notice this and not count?

It is equally implausible to use circulation data or reference data to justify traffic, but these numbers are more accurate for actual use than gate counts can truly be.  Depending on the level of granularity employed in collecting the statistics, one can begin transforming raw data into a patchwork of trends and predictions.  Are there times when the desk is unusually busy and we can staff an extra person as back up?  When the desk is equally as barren can we rely on a triage model or smaller staffing decisions?

At some point in time libraries will be forced to set their hours for what they can financially support.  Budget cuts across the nation have already forced some libraries to eliminate positions and revamp their services.  What would happen if we started keeping shorter hours and allowing students to do more remotely?  Would some students be offended?  Perhaps, but I have seen students waiting outside the doors at the most ungodly hours and not understanding why the doors weren’t always open.   Libraries will always be used and we should be focusing on what students need from us and what services are most vital to the campus.  If what we do is an accurate respresentation of what they need, our success will speak greater volumes than any spreadsheet showing archaic gate counts.

Just my opinion though.

Here is a short presentation I put together to fill in for my absence during the information literacy workshop at the ULS.  I apologize immensely but hope that everyone takes something promising away.

Feel free to post any comments or questions to this post and I will get back to you as soon as I can.

**Note:  The embedded video isn’t working in WordPress for me at the moment.  Here is the direct link.  http://www.slideshare.net/johnfudrow/infolit-gaming

http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/28/google-wave-drips-with-ambition-can-it-fulfill-googles-grand-web-vision/

Google Wave is looking to make a splash and I am excited to test this and see how far we can take it for our reference services.

http://acrlog.org/2009/04/22/assessment-is-the-new-black/

Great Visualization: Web Trends Map 4 (Final Beta) .

We Work Together But Don’t Read Each Other’s Blogs.

I find this very true.  It’s difficult to keep track of everyone and their blogs, but I have made an effort to use Google Reader and collect as many new feeds as I can.  It may seem daunting, but if you read them like emails you can actually get alot of recent events before they are old news.

Twitter can make you immoral, claim scientists | Mail Online.

The constant stream of information obviously leaves no time for reflection and judgement.  As we give students more and more information to select from, are their decisions based on careful consideration or reactionary necessity?  Information morality…hmmm?

Jeff Young from the Chronicle: Wired Campus Blog recounted a new study from Ohio State in which the performance of students was assessed using their use of Facebook as a determining factor.  There are many raised eyebrows surrounding this topic, but the data so far is inconclusive and not accurate enough to draw true correlations between use and performance.  Frankly, I would wager that there are more factors than just Facebook for poor performance.  What if one student didn’t use Facebook but constantly texted their friends in class, played Warcraft until 3a.m. and then spent most of the other times watching old Kung Fu movies without cracking a book?  I would wager that performance would rate rather low.  Then again what if there was another student which had a similar behavior pattern but used Facebook to organize get togethers with their friends, shared assignments online, and contacted their librarian for help via Facebook.  They may still perform poorly, but it wasn’t their use of Facebook that brought them down. 

I would be curious to run a study in which the students are assigned a level of social networking proficiency.  From that we could try to rate whether their networking seemed to add or detract from a normalized pattern of studious behavior.

Justin James submitted a post about possible preferred skills software developers will need in the next few years. It isn’t a far leap to realize that many of these skills will be necessary for librarians dealing with web and application design.