It was reported today that Google will now include magazine contents in its search index. From an AP release:
“As part of its quest to corral more content published on paper, Google Inc. has made digital copies of more than 1 million articles from magazines that hit the newsstands decades ago.”
So what does this mean for us? I would wager that we should be pressing for more integration of catalog searching via both institutional holdings but also Google indexing. Imagine if large portions of commonly held titles were available through Google. Small libraries could pay less in back log files and being to invest in new titles that they had to put on hold for that archival run of magazine articles.
Google has just released their first foray into the internet browser race with their product called Google Chrome. Though my first hand experience has only been for a few short hours, I am already impressed by what they have built.
Chrome features easy tabbed browsing, but bumps it up a notch by dynamically showing you sites that you frequently visit when opening a new tab. The tabs themselves are easy to move around, pop out from the browser into a new window, and won’t crash the entire application if one tab goes kaput. Chrome has instant bookmarking options as well as application shortcuts. It features secure browsing and the newest hot topic for future IE releases, incognito mode. (I am instantly reminded of the Simpsons reference to Guy Incognito.)
I suppose this may be a bit annoying to non-technology nerds and systems administrators, but there is something nice about seamless interoperability in a secure and stable browser. I am anxious to see how people react and what types of hurdles Chrome must leap before it is featured amongst the big names in web browsing.
A new competitor for Google was released in the form of Cuil. Based on work by two ex-Google employees, this search engine’s philosophy is touted as;
Cuil’s goal is to solve the two great problems of search: how to index the whole Internet—not just part of it—and how to analyze and sort out its pages so you get relevant results.
An interesting concept but will the indexing actually help you find what you really “need.” The overall look has a much more modern feel, but just because the container is sleek does not guarantee that the content will be worth it.
The search results page is pleasing to the eye as well and after a short time getting un-Google-fied the multiple avenues of a search progression can start to take shape. I enjoyed how alternate suggestions for the base search were made into tabs above the results. I also liked the concept of the “drill down” box, but the actual interface was a bit too touchy. Maybe they will add other ways to expand and contract the information in later releases.
The results are fairly comparable to Google though there seems to be far fewer unconnected results. (The goal I suppose.) I feel a bit let down by seeing over a million results for my name, but only about 20 links to follow. Perhaps a slight redesign to that display would be in order.
I can’t say I will be switching from the big G but I am going to keep an eye on Cuil.
Extra: I also wanted to point out that I smiled pleasantly after reading this snippet from their site about the reason they chose the Gaelic word Cuil:
Tom Costello, our founder and CEO, comes from Ireland, a country with a rich mythology around the quest for wisdom. Cuil is the Gaelic word for both knowledge and hazel, and features prominently in ancient legend. One famous story tells of a salmon that ate nine hazelnuts that had fallen into the Fountain of Wisdom and thereby gained all the knowledge in the world. Whoever ate the salmon would acquire this knowledge.
A famous poet fished for many years on the River Boyne hoping to catch the Salmon of Knowledge. When he finally caught it, he gave it to his young apprentice Finn McCuil to prepare, warning him not to eat any. As Finn cooked the salmon he burnt his thumb and instinctively sucked it to ease the pain. And so it was Finn and not the poet who gained all the wisdom of the world. Finn went on to become one of the great heroes of Irish folklore. Any time he needed to know the answer to a question, he sucked his thumb.
As a child Tom poached salmon from the same spot on the Boyne where it is said the Salmon of Knowledge was caught.
I am not sure whether to be inspired by this or nervous about the implications of divine inspiration. Granted I have long been an admirer of the Celtic mythological tales. 🙂
Google has unveiled a new offering entitled Lively. This application allows users to chat in a virtual world, eerily similar to Second Life. Though it is still in early development, one can see the appeal of something fairly new to the chat world. Having Google behind this product may attract users addicted to all things Google.
At this point the ability to create items, as in Second Life, hasn’t been implemented. But there is some speculation that their other tool Sketchup, might be used to facilitate such an endeavor. At this point you can stream your photos and videos to those joining you in a room. I haven’t tried the software yet so I won’t speculate on what may be possible, but will say that for all you might want to do in such a room the options seem fairly adequate.
One aspect that I find interesting is the ability to “embed” your room onto your website or blog. It would be fun to see a library create a virtual reference desk room and allow users to chat away. This may be more interesting for public libraries, but it never hurts to experiment with new concepts such as this.
This may be a good time for us (librarians) to harness the way Google is making their searching easier, in order to better explain proper searching techniques using Boolean operators.
OCLC announced that they would be sharing their bib records with Google. This doesn’t include all records in Worldcat but instead those records made in coordination with Google Book Search items. This link would allow users to locate items through either Google Book Search or Worldcat.org, and hopefully end up at their local library in the end. I am curious to see how much more traffic gets pushed to the library from Google.